BWM Runde 1 Mock Paper 4 · IMOolympiad.com · Original practice
4 written-solution problems · Take-home proof practice; no fixed examination timer
This is independent preparation for a take-home competition. For actual entries, follow the organiser’s rules on independent work and permitted collaboration; our hints and solutions are for these original practice tasks only.
Original independent practice in English. Not an official paper or predicted selection test. Keep hints and solutions closed during your attempt.
How to review your proof
Check that you have used every condition, justified the main idea, covered all cases and stated the conclusion. A different complete proof can also be correct. This is a self-review checklist; written proofs are not automatically marked.
Question 1
Let be nonzero real numbers with . Prove that
Find every equality case.
Hint 1
By permuting the variables and, if needed, changing all their signs, assume and .
Hint 2
Put . Express the left side as .
Worked solution 1
Because the nonzero numbers sum to zero, two have one sign and the third has the opposite sign. Permuting the variables and changing all three signs do not change the expression. We may therefore suppose and .
Set . Since , we have , with equality exactly when . Also
Here , which explains the last denominator. Multiplication gives . Its difference from the proposed bound is
All factors apart from are positive for . Equality is therefore equivalent to , giving after undoing the sign change and permutation, where . Every such triple meets the condition and attains the bound.
Conclusion: Equality holds exactly for permutations of , with .
Review the idea: Algebraic identities · Inequality rules and signs
Question 2
Prove that an integer is prime if and only if
Hint 1
For prime , use .
Hint 2
For composite , choose a prime divisor and use . Show that .
Worked solution 2
If is prime. For ,
The right side is divisible by , whereas none of is. Euclid’s prime-divisor rule therefore implies .
If is composite. Choose a prime divisor of . Then , so the alleged property would apply at . Write if it holds. The factorial identity
then gives . But
The integer is coprime to , so it can be cancelled modulo . We get , a contradiction. This also handles , where is nonzero modulo 2. Thus no composite has the property.
Conclusion: The divisibility condition holds exactly for prime .
Review the idea: Combinations and binomial coefficients · Prime numbers · Divisibility
Question 3
Colour the cells of a rectangular board in the usual alternating black-and-white chessboard pattern. Remove any two cells of opposite colours. Prove that the remaining cells can be tiled by dominoes, with rotations allowed.
Hint 1
Find a closed route through all 48 cells, visiting each cell exactly once and moving only between cells sharing a side.
Hint 2
Remove the two chosen cells from this route. Use the alternating colours to show that each remaining path contains an even number of cells.
Worked solution 3
We first build one closed route through all cells. Number rows 1 to 6 from top to bottom and columns 1 to 8 from left to right. Starting at , go right along row 1 to column 8. Snake through rows 2 to 6 using columns 2 to 8: travel left along row 2, right along row 3, left along row 4, right along row 5, and left along row 6. Move from to , then go up column 1 to the starting cell.
Every step joins cells sharing a side, and each cell occurs exactly once before the route closes. Along this cycle the colours alternate. If two cells of opposite colours are removed, the number of steps between them along either direction of the cycle is odd. Hence the number of cells strictly between them is even.
The remaining route therefore consists of two paths, each containing an even number of cells; one path may be empty if the removed cells were neighbours on the route. On each nonempty path, pair its first cell with its second, its third with its fourth, and so on. Each pair shares a side and forms a domino. The pairs are disjoint and cover precisely all remaining cells, proving the claim.
Conclusion: Every pair of opposite-coloured removed cells admits a domino tiling.
Review the idea: Parity · Counting with bijections · Proof methods
Question 4
Let be a convex trapezoid, with vertices in order and . Write and . Its diagonals meet at . The line through parallel to the bases meets at and at . Prove that
Hint 1
Similarity of triangles and determines how divides both diagonals.
Hint 2
Compare triangles and , then triangles and .
Worked solution 4
The diagonals of a convex quadrilateral meet inside it. Thus the parallel line crosses the two legs and , with in that order.
Triangles and have equal vertical angles at and corresponding angles from , so they are similar. Therefore
Because , triangles and are similar. It follows that
Likewise , so triangles and are similar. Hence , giving the same value for . In particular, is the midpoint of the parallel section and .
Conclusion: .
Review the idea: Similar triangles · Quadrilaterals and their diagonals
After this paper
Choose one gap in your proof to repair, study the linked idea, and write a complete solution again before the next mock.
Choose another paper · Check your German selection route
Format reference: official organiser information. Questions and explanations are independent practice material.