Inequalities path · I02
Before this lesson: Inequality rules and signs, Mathematical induction: the first principle
Your goal: State the domain and prove a product bound from a two-factor case.
Start with the idea and one example. Take a break before the written task if you need it. The questions are original teaching exercises, not official past-paper questions.
Weierstrass product inequalities: the key idea
Product bounds often begin by expanding two factors. If x,y≥0, then (1+x)(1+y)=1+x+y+xy≥1+x+y. Repeating the argument proves for nonnegative inputs. A related form is when 0≤xᵢ≤1. For the second form, multiplication by 1−xᵢ preserves order because it is nonnegative. These bounds are useful when a long product looks harder than a short sum. Check the sign hypotheses before using either form.
A worked example
Give a lower bound for (1+1/10)(1+1/20)(1+1/30).
All three increments are nonnegative, so the product is at least 1+1/10+1/20+1/30=71/60. The extra pairwise and triple products are nonnegative, which explains why the linear expression is a lower bound.
Your turn: change one thing
Prove (1−a)(1−b)≥1−a−b for 0≤a,b≤1.
Try this on paper before opening the explanation.
Compare your reasoning
Expand: (1−a)(1−b)−(1−a−b)=ab≥0. Equality holds exactly when ab=0.
Pause and check
A trap to avoid: Using a product inequality outside its hypotheses.
Practise and adjust the level
Foundation checks the language; Core applies the method; Stretch asks you to choose or justify an idea. These are levels within this lesson. A session selects six of the nine questions; unused questions allow the level to change. Advanced theory still needs written practice.
Interactive practice loads here. You can also use the complete question set below.
Write a complete argument
Prove for xᵢ≥0 by induction.
Planning hint
List the assumptions and the exact conclusion. Identify the definition or theorem in this lesson that connects them. Explain why its conditions hold before using it.
Read the full solution after your attempt
For n=1 equality holds. Suppose the product of the first n factors is at least 1+S, where S is their nonnegative sum. Multiply by 1+xₙ₊₁>0: the new product is at least (1+S)(1+xₙ₊₁)=1+S+xₙ₊₁+Sxₙ₊₁≥1+S+xₙ₊₁. This proves the next case. Equality requires at most one positive input.
My proof notebook
Write on paper, or keep a draft here. Compare your reasoning with the solution only after a real attempt. The checklist is your own review, not an automatic mark.
All nine practice questions
Prefer paper or have JavaScript switched off? The complete question set, hints and solutions are here. Interactive practice uses these same questions in an order chosen from your answers.
1. For x,y≥0, what is (1+x)(1+y)−(1+x+y)?
Foundation
- −xy
- 1
- xy
- x+y
Hint
Expand both sides.
Answer and reasoning
xy. The constant and linear terms cancel, leaving xy.
2. Which hypothesis guarantees xy≥0 here?
Foundation
- x≠y alone
- x,y≥0
- x<0<y
- x+y>0 alone
Hint
The sign of a product depends on both factors.
Answer and reasoning
x,y≥0. Two nonnegative factors have a nonnegative product.
3. For a,b≥0, which bound is valid?
Core
- (1+a)(1+b)≤1+a+b
- (1+a)(1+b)=1+a+b always
- (1+a)(1+b)<1
- (1+a)(1+b)≥1+a+b
Hint
Inspect the extra term ab.
Answer and reasoning
(1+a)(1+b)≥1+a+b. Expansion adds the nonnegative term ab.
4. For 0≤a,b≤1, when is (1−a)(1−b)=1−a−b?
Core
- When ab=0
- Only when a=b=1
- Whenever a=b
- Never
Hint
The difference is ab.
Answer and reasoning
When ab=0. Equality means the nonnegative difference ab vanishes.
5. Why require 1−xᵢ≥0 in the inductive proof of the minus-form bound?
Stretch
- To avoid all equality cases
- To ensure n=1
- To preserve an inequality when multiplying
- To make every sum prime
Hint
Track the multiplying factor.
Answer and reasoning
To preserve an inequality when multiplying. A negative multiplier would reverse the inequality and invalidate that step.
6. With all xᵢ≥0, when can hold?
Stretch
- All are strictly positive and n>1
- Only when n is even
- At most one xᵢ is positive
- Exactly two are positive
Hint
Look at the pairwise product terms.
Answer and reasoning
At most one xᵢ is positive. If two inputs are positive, their pairwise product makes the expansion strictly larger. If at most one is positive, every higher-order product vanishes.
7. For nonnegative x,y, which product expansion is correct?
Foundation
- (1+x)(1+y)=1+x+y+xy
- 1+x+y only
- 1+xy only
- 1−x−y+xy
Hint
Multiply the two brackets.
Answer and reasoning
(1+x)(1+y)=1+x+y+xy. Each first-factor term multiplies each second-factor term.
8. For x=1,y=2, by how much does (1+x)(1+y) exceed 1+x+y?
Core
- 3
- 6
- 2
- 1
Hint
The difference is xy.
Answer and reasoning
2. The product is 6 and the linear expression is 4.
9. Why is nonnegativity relevant to the product bound?
Stretch
- It makes the discarded higher products nonnegative
- It makes all inputs equal
- It makes multiplication unnecessary
- It restricts inputs to integers
Hint
Inspect xy in the two-factor case.
Answer and reasoning
It makes the discarded higher products nonnegative. Removing a nonnegative product can only decrease the expression.
Choose your next step
Continue to Absolute-value inequalities. If this felt difficult, return to a prerequisite above. Every lesson stays open.
Original teaching material · IMOolympiad.com. Send a specific correction through our contact page. Learning progress is optional and stays in this browser.